The effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological intervention for pain management in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review.

Chronic pain is a non-motor symptom affecting from 60 to 80% of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). PD patients can suffer from different types of pain, either specific or not specific of the disease, and depending on various pathophysiological mechanisms (nociceptive, nociplastic or neuropathic), which can be present at any stage of the disease. Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are essential to complement routine care interventions in PD pain management. Moreover, in the literature, it has been shown that 42% of PD patients are already using complementary therapies. Hence, our aim was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of NPIs for pain management in PD. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Eighteen published randomized control trials (RCTs) were included between 2004 and 2021 leading to a total of 976 PD patients. From them, we reported fifteen different NPIs classified in seven categories: physical exercises, balneotherapy, manual therapy, acupuncture, botanical preparation, body-psychological practice and multiprotection care. Our results have shown that NPIs for PD pain management had a low-to-moderate level of evidence showing mainly favourable results, even if some NPIs presented inconclusive results. Moreover, our review highlighted the clinical relevance of some specific NPIs in PD pain management: NPIs consisting of active physical activities, opposed to passive activities. The safety of NPIs was also confirmed since only few minor transient adverse events were reported. Nevertheless, even if some interesting results were found, the methodology of future studies needs to be more robust and to include comprehensive descriptions in order to offer reliable and sound recommendations to clinicians.

Impact of therapeutic education on the evolution of social representations of medication in patients with Parkinson's disease: A quantitative and qualitative study (ETPARK REMED).

BACKGROUND: Among the workshops of our therapeutic patient education (TPE) program, the medication workshop (TPEM workshop) is very frequently proposed to patients in view of the difficulties they encounter related to the complexity of managing antiparkinsonian treatment. Patients' appropriation of their medications could depend on their social representations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of our TPEM workshop on the social representations PD patients have of their medications and to compare it with that of another therapeutic intervention such as a talking group defined as the control group. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized, parallel-group study investigated the social representations of medication through a questionnaire on knowledge about antiparkinsonian medications, a questionnaire on beliefs about medication (BMQ), and a word association task. RESULTS: In the TPEM group (n=16), the workshop induced significant effects over time on the knowledge questionnaire (P=0.01), BMQ specific necessity and concerns scores (P=0.04 and 0.01, respectively), necessity-concerns differential (P=0.04), and BMQ general harm (P=0.04). No significant difference was found in the talking group (n=6). Comparison of the two groups showed a significant difference of the BMQ general harm with a decrease in belief in the harmfulness of the medications in the workshop group (P=0.03). The results of the verbal association task showed a modification in the content and structure of the social representations of medication in the TPEM group. DISCUSSION: The TPEM workshop helped reduce initial negative aspects of medication representations. Improved knowledge of their medication allowed patients to feel more competent and legitimate in communicating with caregivers, modifying their beliefs about medications. Indeed, the medication was perceived as less restrictive, care becoming central as shown by the emergence of the medical team in the social representations of the medication. CONCLUSION: All the results show a specific beneficial effect of the TPEM workshop through an evolution of the social representations of medications, which became more positive in our PD patients.

Body mass index variations in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion: A case control study versus standard of care and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is an advanced therapy for patients with Parkinson Disease (PD). Weight loss has been pointed out as an adverse event of LCIG infusion. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To compare weight changes between three groups of PD patients: patients treated with LCIG, patients within the first year of subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and patients treated exclusively with oral treatment during 1 year of follow up. METHODS: Patients treated with LCIG were retrospectively matched by age, gender, disease duration and Hoehn and Yahr to patients undergoing STN-DBS and to patients both receiving the standard of care treatment and unwilling advanced therapies (SOC). Clinical features and weight were collected at baseline, and 12 months after introducing the treatment (LCIG and STN-DBS groups) or for one year of treatment (SOC). RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included in each group. They had no differences in clinical and demographic features, except for cognitive impairment. There was a mean weight (-5.8kg ±6.8) and BMI (-2.1kg/m2±2.6) reduction in the LCIG group after 12 months, while there was a slight weight loss in the SOC (-1.4kg ±3.1) and a weight increase in the STN-DBS group (5.4kg ±4.7). Differences of weight were statistically different between, LCIG and STN-DBS (P<0.001), LCIG and SOC (P=0.002) and STN-DBS and SOC (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows a significant weight reduction after starting LCIG infusion compared to the other groups. Weight loss should be closely monitored in patients treated with LCIG.

Early hydrocephalus in Listeria meningitis: Case report and review of the literature.

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive bacterium with a predilection to infect the central nervous system, often affecting immunocompromised or elderly patients. The most common manifestations are meningitis and rhomboencephalitis. We report two cases of Listeria meningitis complicated by acute hydrocephalus several days after presentation and we further review the literature of similar cases. We conclude that acute hydrocephalus is a significant, not often recognized, complication of Listeria meningitis, usually occurring several days from onset when coverage did not include anti-Listeria antimicrobials. In high risk patients, meningitis combined with acute hydrocephalus is suggestive of LM infection.

Abnormal pain perception in patients with Multiple System Atrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Parkinson's disease or Multiple System Atrophy frequently experience painful sensations. The few studies investigating pain mechanisms in Multiple System Atrophy patients have reported contradictory results. In our study, we compared pain thresholds in Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson's disease patients and healthy controls and evaluated the effect of l-DOPA on pain thresholds. METHODS: We assessed subjective and objective pain thresholds (using a thermotest and RIII reflex), and pain tolerance in OFF and ON conditions, clinical pain, motor and psychological evaluation. RESULTS: Pain was reported in 78.6% of Multiple System Atrophy patients and in 37.5% of Parkinson's disease patients. In the OFF condition, subjective and objective pain thresholds were significantly lower in Multiple System Atrophy patients than in healthy controls (43.8 °C ± 1.3 vs 45.7 °C ± 0.8; p = 0.0005 and 7.4 mA ± 3.8 vs 13.7 mA ± 2.8; p = 0.002, respectively). They were also significantly reduced in Multiple System Atrophy compared to Parkinson's disease patients. No significant difference was found in pain tolerance for the 3 groups and in the effect of l-DOPA on pain thresholds in Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson's disease patients. In the ON condition, pain tolerance tended to be reduced in Multiple System Atrophy versus Parkinson's disease patients (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Multiple System Atrophy patients had an increase in pain perception compared to Parkinson's disease patients and healthy controls. The l-DOPA effect was similar for pain thresholds in Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson's disease patients, but tended to worsen pain tolerance in Multiple System Atrophy.